  What you need to know today in crypto and beyond March 12, 2021 Sponsored By:  If you were forwarded this newsletter and would like to receive it, sign up here.
Send feedback to marc.hochstein@coindesk.com – we'd love to hear from you!
Top Shelf Today's must-reads
DERIVATIVES DING? The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is investigating Binance on rumors the exchange allowed U.S. residents to trade derivatives in violation of U.S. rules. Binance hasn't been accused of any wrongdoing and the CFTC may not bring an enforcement action. Binance CEO thinks the inquiry is "FUD," or "fear, uncertainty and doubt." The news comes a day after Binance announced Max Baucus, a former U.S. senator and ambassador to China will join as a policy adviser who would be able to navigate the exchange's relationship with U.S. regulators. A PAL, A DOGE, AN OVER-SERVED WEBSITE: Hello Pal International's website crashed after the firm announced plans to mine dogecoin and other cryptocurrencies. On March 8, the Canadian tech firm announced the acquisition of an initial 15% interest in a dedicated dogecoin and litecoin mining facility, and the acquisition of an initial 51% of at least 12,500 mining rigs dedicated to mining both cryptocurrencies. DECENTRALIZED MERGER: Two ICO-era encryption projects, Keep and NuCypher have begun discussing what they are calling a "hard merge," codename: Keanu. The merger would see the protocols' functions and communities combine, not the companies. Keep protocol has been entrusted with $243 million worth of crypto assets to run its Bitcoin network, according to data site DeFi Pulse. NuCypher has roughly $265 million worth of ETH staked to run its encryption network. GONE PUBLIC: CoinShares has begun trading on Nasdaq Nordic after an oversubscribed public offering. CoinShares listed Thursday on the Nasdaq First North Growth Market, an alternative stock exchange for small and medium-sized growth companies in Europe. The offering consisted of 3,364,403 shares at 44.90 SEK (US$5.29) apiece and totaling 151 million SEK ($17.8 million). Shares jumped 33% in its first day of trading and trade under the "CS" ticker, not "COIN" as initially planned.
– Daniel Kuhn
Sound Bite Overheard on CoinDesk TV
History is not made "everydays" Yesterday, Mike Winkelmann, the digital artist better known as Beeple, made art history after a collage of his work hammered at Christie's for over $69 million, including fees.
Today, Winkelmann admits the NFT scene (short for non-fungible token, the general application technology that underpins his latest digital creation as well as a host of other digital works going for near-incomprehensible valuations) might be in a bubble.
"I think it's a bubble," he said on CoinDesk TV. "Where we are in that bubble, or if it's not a bubble now … I do believe it probably will be a bubble at some point because there's just so many people rushing into this space."
The open market valued Beeple's "Everydays – The First 5000 Days" more than works from J.M.W. Turner, Georges Seurat and Francisco Goya, the New York Times reminds us. Only two other living artists have ever sold a work for more money, Beeple said.
Winkelmann said he's never priced a piece of his own art above $969. "Everydays" opened at auction two weeks ago for $100. The work looked set to close at $20 million, until Tron founder Justin Sun and another mysterious buyer bid the work up past $60 million in the last moments. (Winkelmann will disclose the winner's identity soon, he said.)
Beeple's reputation precedes the crypto scene, with commissions from luxury brands and football franchises. He pioneered a workflow called "everydays," committing to releasing at least one digital painting per day. It was a pace of creation he kept for the past 13 years.
It's those works that comprise "Everydays," technically making the NFT 13 years in the making and perhaps adding to its value.
"The market decides this stuff. I have no idea what it's worth. It's worth how much people will pay for it," Winkelmann said, noting the labor involved.
"I plan to reinvest it in the artwork itself, and making bigger and sort of cooler art projects that take more time and resources like this. I look at the people collecting this work as investors," Winkelmann said.
– D.K.
SPONSORED BY NEXO  Your digital assets deserve a savings account in their BEST INTEREST. Leading crypto lender Nexo treats you, your crypto and your fiat to industry-best Crypto & Fiat services, featuring:
* Up to 12% interest on digital assets, paid out daily! * Yields available on BTC, ETH, LTC, BCH, XRP, XLM, EOS, TRX, LINK, BNB, PAXG, USDT, USDC, TUSD, PAX, DAI, HUSD, GBP and EUR. * No minimum or maximum limits on funds deposited, offering infinite opportunities to earn. * #ZeroFees on all transactions. * Military-grade wallet security and top-tier insurance on all custodial assets with SOC 2 Type 2 certified crypto custodian BitGo.
Get started at nexo.io
 Introducing The Hash, news analysis on CoinDesk TV From the world leader in crypto news and events, the all-new CoinDesk TV covers the rapidly evolving world of digital finance and its role in the global economy.
We cut through the hyperbole and confusion to explain what's happening in this fast-changing industry and why it matters to investors, companies and governments.
On The Hash, a daily panel show, CoinDesk journalists Zack Seward, Benjamin Powers and Will Foxley choose five of the day's big stories to hash out and analyze. With a personality-driven, fast-paced, entertaining format, it presents themes ranging from serious to fun.
Watch "The Hash" daily on YouTube or CoinDesk.com.
Off-Chain Signals What others are writing....
This is not your grandpa's internet bubble. How Facebook got addicted to spreading misinformation. Hedge funds are fuelling the Spac boom.
– D.K.
The Takeaway Putting the news in perspective
NFTs, Mortgages and Bananas If you're baffled by the craze for non-fungible tokens (NFTs), those bespoke digital assets selling for millions of dollars, here's one way to make sense of the phenomenon.
First, keep in mind that a thing can be split into two things. Second, understand that the value of each thing, before and after the split, is in the eye of the beholder.
Now, picture a banana.
When picked from the plant, the elongated fruit is encased in its yellow skin. The skin can be peeled off.
You can use the peels as compost in your garden. Also, banana peels can be used for pranks, such as by leaving one on the floor for someone to slip on or for stuffing into a car's tailpipe. These are mean tricks so don't do them.
In the 1960s, there was even a brief fad of smoking banana peels. According to Wikipedia, the "recipe" for extracting a fictional substance called bananadine from the peel was a hoax, but who's to say those kids didn't feel some kind of high?
The point is the value of a banana, and of its peel, is subjective. I throw banana peels into the garbage but there's a saying: One man's trash is another man's treasure.
To recap: One object can become two objects and, both before and after they are separated, the value of each object is in the eye of the beholder – as it is for anything else.
To further illustrate these ideas, let's consider a much more serious example: the $11 trillion U.S. mortgage industry.
Home sweet home Unfortunately, the mortgage market is as convoluted as anything in DeFi. I will break it down as simply as I can, and thank readers in advance for keeping up.
If you financed a home with a mortgage, chances are the institution where you send your monthly payment is not the same one that holds the mortgage. It also may or may not be the same bank that loaned you the money in the first place.
That's because, like the banana, a mortgage is an asset that can be split into parts and sold separately to different entities. Think of the debt itself as the edible part of the banana. It typically gets packaged, with a whole bunch of other naked bananas, into those complex securities you heard about in "The Big Short."
Too unglamorous for Hollywood dramatizations, the peel is known as the mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). This is a set of administrative duties your lender may or may not farm out after the loan closes. A servicer manages billing and payments, pays property taxes and hazard insurance on your behalf, writes a nasty letter if you pay late and does other scutwork.
The MSR is part of the whole when the loan is written; it can remain so or be peeled off (mortgage pros even speak of a "servicing strip"). The difference is that while you can eat the banana and keep the skin, when a loan is paid off the MSR disappears.
Like loans, MSRs routinely get aggregated into big packages and sold to the highest bidder. To be clear, the company that wins the peels doesn't work for you, the borrower; it works for whoever has the bananas, the mortgage holder.
From that investor's perspective, the debt has value because the holder is entitled to your monthly principal and interest payments over the life of the loan – and, if you fall behind and never catch up, after 90 days or so it can take your house. For the buyer of the peel, servicing rights have value because the servicer earns a fee (a cut of the interest) for its drudgery.
What's it worth? Hard to say How valuable are these two assets? The mortgage and the associated servicing rights both generate income for their respective owners. The question is how long the assets will do so.
For both assets, the answer depends on how likely you are to stay in the home before:
1) Selling it, meaning you pay off the loan early 2) Refinancing the loan, which also means you pay it off early 3) Defaulting, which means the servicer takes your house on the investor's behalf, and both parties incur costs selling it 4) Paying down the balance over the full term (as long as 30 years in the U.S.)
All of that, in turn, depends on the outlook for interest rates, home prices, employment levels and probably lots of other things. Wall Street has long employed armies of highly paid propellerheads who crunch numbers to estimate the "prepayment speed" of mortgage assets.
Notice that word, estimate. Forecasts are right or wrong in retrospect, but nobody knows what's going to happen until it happens. And banks often get rekt when they underestimate how quickly loans pay off.
Once again: One asset can become two (banana/loan, peel/servicing), and the value of each is subjective.
But "subjective" here does not mean "untethered from reality."
Bragging rights A couple years ago, someone taped an unpeeled banana to a Miami gallery wall, called it art and sold the work to three different buyers for more than $100,000 a pop.
By "the work," I don't mean the banana itself, which was bound to rot. The banana was replaceable, in the artist's instructions for recreating the work, according to an explanation in Vogue. The buyers got a certificate, which is how there could be three of them and only one banana.
Why would anyone pay six figures for … the right to duct tape a banana to a wall and call it someone else's creation? I can think of at least two reasons.
One is, you really appreciate the work and want to patronize the artist, because you believe it makes an important statement about …something. The other is so you can impress your friends (and one-up your rivals) at the next cocktail party.
In other words, the bragging rights.
That may be part of the reason why non-fungible tokens (NFT) are blowing up in these strange times. Digital items are just as brag inducing as their canvas-based counterparts – and arguably more liquid as an asset class.
(By the way, the title of the banana masterpiece was "Comedian." Read that however you want.)
Just a JPEG For a definition of NFTs, I can't improve upon this by my CoinDesk colleague Nikhilesh De in his "State of Crypto" newsletter: "To be clear: You can still download the image file recorded in an NFT. If you sell a tweet, that tweet will still exist on Twitter, visible to all. ... Think of them as autographed football cards. You could print as many copies as you want but if the player signs only one, that's the card that'll likely have the most value. For example, an autographed Tom Brady card just sold for $1.32 million."
You might think: $1 million for a piece of cardboard? Ha, that's chump change. In this week's biggest crypto story, someone won an auction at Christie's by paying $69.5 million for an NFT by the artist known as Beeple.
This mystery buyer outbid noted aesthete and Tron founder Justin Sun, who was ready to pay $60 million. But if either of them simply wanted to appreciate the work, known as "EVERYDAYS: THE FIRST 5000 DAYS," they didn't have to pay a dime. Beeple's collage is viewable for free online. And since it's a purely digital work, "owning" it doesn't confer the same advantage as displaying a painting (or a banana) in your den.
I'd suggest this is the core innovation of the NFT: It has separated the bragging rights (h/t to Bloomberg's Tracy Alloway) of owning a rare object from possession of the object, much like Wall Street decades ago cleaved servicing rights from the underlying mortgages. Or, in the case of virtual "objects" that no one can solely possess, NFTs have preserved, or resurrected, the bragging rights.
Unlike servicing rights, though, bragging rights don't have an income stream; their value is psychological (one art critic has called NFT collecting "posing.") and thus presumably even harder to model.
But not impossible to finance! As CoinDesk's Brady Dale reports, there are now decentralized finance markets where you can pledge NFTs as collateral for loans.
I don't mean to sneer. For one thing, the NFT phenomenon has shown positive side effects. Beeple is likely set for life and can pursue his art without ever worrying about putting food on the table. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has pledged to charity the proceeds of an ongoing auction for the first-ever tweet, last bid at $2.5 million.
And as with fruits or byzantine financial contracts, if you think these valuations are absurd, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. The buyers, though, should keep in mind that art markets, just like financial ones, are known to crash. It's hard to imagine the same can't happen for "art" you can't even hang on a wall. So they'd best be ready to savor their bragging rights for a long time. Longer than many Americans stay in their homes.
Paying almost $70 million to "own" a picture anyone can look at for free may sound bananas. But clearly, the time is ripe to sell NFTs.
– Marc Hochstein
 What are bitcoin and ether's value propositions for investors? A new report by CoinDesk Research explains how the two most popular cryptocurrencies by market capitalization behave in the market, how their infrastructure differs, and what on-chain metrics say about them.
Download "Bitcoin + Ether: An Investor's Perspective" from the CoinDesk Research Hub.
The Chaser...
ATTENTION: Scammers have been sending fraudulent emails with links to sites disguised to look like coindesk.com. If you are in doubt about a link, type https://www.coindesk.com directly into your browser; do not copy and paste. Remember, if something seems too good to be true, it probably is.
Copyright © 2021 CoinDesk, All rights reserved.
250 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003, USA You can manage your preferences here or unsubscribe from all CoinDesk email. |
Friday, March 12, 2021
NFTs, Mortgages and Bananas
